During episode 5 of
TuxJam I reviewed a browser called
SRWare Iron. This is a fork of the Chromium browser (an open-source community version of Google Chrome) with a few tweaks under the hood.
I put three different browsers to the test using two online tools:
Acid3 and
Peacekeeper. The three browsers in question were:
- SRWare Iron
- Firefox 9.0a1
- Seamonkey 2.3.3
From the Acid3 test, all the browsers performed very well:
SRWare Iron
Firefox
Seamonkeydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdf43/cdf43e6fc1356c3c970a18068ed4c53895287bc3" alt=""
However, it is during the second test using the Peacekeeper resource that
SRWare Iron really separated itself from the other two. A brief look at the overall points:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d56/48d56a4a51966b40cdd6343733ad9d7366e41ef7" alt=""
Then we can break these down into more detailed reports of how the browsers final score was achieved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87ec0/87ec06f8f02951f5556cc49259ac432ed89dac84" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4392c/4392c5fc79019efdea1e2b712699ded24f8343df" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a9b/b6a9b197d178ac088745a2a731ef6466732172ac" alt=""
From these findings on the Peacekeeper website, it appears that
SRWare Iron performs doubly well compared to
Firefox and
Seamonkey. Whilst I did find it was a fast browser, I didn't notice that much difference between the three. However all of these browsers noticeably outperform Internet Explorer which I have to use day to day in my place of work. I do not wish to install it and run it using WINE to perform a fair test.
During episode 5 of
TuxJam I reviewed a browser called
SRWare Iron. This is a fork of the Chromium browser (an open-source community version of Google Chrome) with a few tweaks under the hood.
I put three different browsers to the test using two online tools:
Acid3 and
Peacekeeper. The three browsers in question were:
- SRWare Iron
- Firefox 9.0a1
- Seamonkey 2.3.3
From the Acid3 test, all the browsers performed very well:
SRWare Iron
Firefox
Seamonkeydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdf43/cdf43e6fc1356c3c970a18068ed4c53895287bc3" alt=""
However, it is during the second test using the Peacekeeper resource that
SRWare Iron really separated itself from the other two. A brief look at the overall points:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d56/48d56a4a51966b40cdd6343733ad9d7366e41ef7" alt=""
Then we can break these down into more detailed reports of how the browsers final score was achieved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87ec0/87ec06f8f02951f5556cc49259ac432ed89dac84" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4392c/4392c5fc79019efdea1e2b712699ded24f8343df" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a9b/b6a9b197d178ac088745a2a731ef6466732172ac" alt=""
From these findings on the Peacekeeper website, it appears that
SRWare Iron performs doubly well compared to
Firefox and
Seamonkey. Whilst I did find it was a fast browser, I didn't notice that much difference between the three. However all of these browsers noticeably outperform Internet Explorer which I have to use day to day in my place of work. I do not wish to install it and run it using WINE to perform a fair test.
Putting Browsers to the test with Acid3 and Peacekeeper
No comments:
Post a Comment